Privatscore für Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (1)
| Runde 1 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 34,2 MP | = | 77,78 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | | | 60+% | = | 13,2 MP | + | 60,09 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ -2 | ♥4 | +100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ -1 | ♠K | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ = | ♣8 | −1430 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA +2 | ♦6 | +150 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +2 | ♠5 | −660 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA = | ♠2 | −120 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ -2 | ♥A | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 42,0 MP | = | 95,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♥10 | +430 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ X -1 | ♠A | +200 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 30,0 MP | = | 68,18 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3♣ +1 | ♥4 | +130 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ +1 | ♣A | +650 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | S 2♣ = | ♠A | +90 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♣2 | +430 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 38,0 MP | = | 86,37 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♥6 | +110 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +1 | ♥2 | −430 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 39,0 MP | = | 88,64 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA X = | ♦10 | +180 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ -1 | ♥A | +100 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ -1 | ♠5 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -1 | ♦5 | +100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ X = | ♣A | −590 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 317,2 MP = 60,08 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (2)
| Runde 1 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 4♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 5♥ +1 | ♠8 | −680 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 34,0 MP | = | 77,28 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA +3 | ♠B | −210 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA -1 | ♠2 | +100 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 3♠ X -3 | ♥A | +500 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♥K | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | S 2SA -4 | ♠B | −400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3♦ +1 | ♠A | +130 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ -1 | ♣B | −100 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ -1 | ♣D | +100 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | S 3♥ = | ♦A | +140 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ +1 | ♣8 | +450 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -5 | ♥4 | +250 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 15,91 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 2♦ +2 | ♣B | −130 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ X = | ♦D | −790 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +1 | ♣B | +140 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +2 | ♦B | −680 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 39,0 MP | = | 88,64 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -1 | ♦A | +100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -1 | ♥7 | +50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -1 | ♣8 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 307,0 MP = 58,14 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (3)
| Runde 1 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA +3 | ♥4 | +180 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +1 | ♣3 | −630 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA -1 | ♥K | +50 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 18,18 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♥6 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | W 2♥ +1 | ♦K | −140 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3♦ -1 | ♥4 | −50 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | S 3♥ +4 | ♥5 | +260 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ -2 | ♣D | +200 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA = | ♣8 | +400 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 34,09 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 3♦ = | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA = | ♠3 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ +1 | ♦D | −650 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 1♠ +2 | ♥10 | +140 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♣4 | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 2♥ +3 | ♠9 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ X -1 | ♥7 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA = | ♠8 | +90 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 26,1 MP | = | 59,30 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | O 2♣ = | ♦A | −90 | = | 12,1 MP | | 54,95 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ +4 | ♥3 | −230 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Ergebnis: 11. Rang mit 232,1 MP = 43,96 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für xxx – xxx (4)
| Runde 1 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2♠ = | ♣B | −110 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | W 3♣ X -1 | ♥2 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA +3 | ♥K | +180 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ -2 | ♥8 | −200 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 4♦ = | ♠A | +130 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ +2 | ♣A | +680 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 35,0 MP | = | 79,55 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | O 3♦ -1 | ♣A | +100 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +2 | ♥5 | +460 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 38,64 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA = | ♠5 | −90 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | S 3♥ -1 | ♦A | −50 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 31,82 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 6♥ +1 | ♠A | −1010 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | N 3♥ -3 | ♠10 | −300 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 2SA +1 | ♣6 | −150 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♦D | −620 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +1 | ♥10 | +140 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | W 2♥ +2 | ♦B | −170 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ -1 | ♦8 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 16,7 MP | = | 38,03 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | O 2♥ = | ♠B | −110 | = | 7,7 MP | - | 35,14 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ = | ♥5 | −420 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 4♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ = | ♠8 | −1430 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Ergebnis: 7. Rang mit 267,7 MP = 50,70 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (5)
| Runde 1 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA +2 | ♥K | +150 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♥8 | +110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 27,0 MP | = | 61,37 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -2 | ♠A | −100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ X +1 | ♣A | +990 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 18,18 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 2♠ +2 | ♣D | −170 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 2♦ +2 | ♣8 | +130 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 6,0 MP | = | 13,64 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA +1 | ♠5 | −120 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +3 | ♠B | −510 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA +1 | ♥4 | −150 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 15,91 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | W 2♥ +1 | ♦9 | −140 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ +1 | ♦D | −650 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2SA = | ♣2 | +120 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♠2 | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | W 3♥ +1 | ♦6 | −170 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ = | ♥7 | +420 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ -1 | ♣A | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 20,3 MP | = | 46,07 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | W 2♠ +2 | ♦3 | −170 | = | 2,3 MP | --- | 10,32 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ -1 | ♦D | +50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 33,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 4♣ -1 | ♦8 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +2 | ♠8 | −680 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 38,0 MP | = | 86,37 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ = | ♣10 | +620 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 3♥ = | ♣8 | −140 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Ergebnis: 9. Rang mit 261,3 MP = 49,49 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (6)
| Runde 1 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -3 | ♠6 | −150 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ X = | ♣B | +790 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ -1 | ♣D | +100 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 39,0 MP | = | 88,64 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | N 3♠ +2 | ♦9 | +200 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ +1 | ♠B | −1010 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -1 | ♥4 | +50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | N 2♣ -1 | ♥K | −50 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ +1 | ♦D | −170 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ -1 | ♠5 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | S 1♦ -1 | ♠A | −100 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 34,0 MP | = | 77,28 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 2♦ = | ♠K | +90 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 18,3 MP | = | 41,53 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ +1 | ♥K | −170 | = | 2,3 MP | --- | 10,32 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 3♠ +1 | ♣D | −170 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 4♦ -1 | ♣A | −50 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +2 | ♣8 | −680 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♣8 | −650 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA -3 | ♥3 | +300 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♥5 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Ergebnis: 3. Rang mit 303,3 MP = 57,44 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (7)
| Runde 1 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | S 4♣ -1 | ♠A | −100 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♠2 | +430 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -2 | ♦7 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -1 | ♥4 | +50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 3♦ = | ♣B | −110 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ -1 | ♦D | +100 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +1 | ♥10 | +140 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +2 | ♠4 | −680 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 35,0 MP | = | 79,55 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 2♥ +2 | ♠D | −170 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ X -1 | ♣A | +100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 41,0 MP | = | 93,18 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA = | ♣8 | +600 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 2,3 MP | = | 5,16 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ +1 | ♦2 | −170 | = | 2,3 MP | --- | 10,32 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +2 | ♣5 | −460 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 5,0 MP | = | 11,37 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ -3 | ♥9 | −150 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ = | ♣6 | −1430 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +2 | ♥8 | −660 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -1 | ♠B | +100 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ -1 | ♦D | +50 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♣4 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♥8 | +110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Ergebnis: 5. Rang mit 277,3 MP = 52,52 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (8)
| Runde 1 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 4SA = | ♥4 | −430 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 2♦ +2 | ♣9 | −130 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♦D | −620 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♣B | +110 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♣4 | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ = | ♣A | −620 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 31,82 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ +2 | ♣A | +200 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ -1 | ♠K | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 21,6 MP | = | 49,18 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ -1 | ♦9 | +50 | = | 18,6 MP | ++ | 84,73 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ +1 | ♦D | −450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 44,0 MP | = | 100,00 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 3♦ +1 | ♠A | +130 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 3♥ +3 | ♣10 | −230 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 5♥ -1 | ♣8 | +100 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA -1 | ♥3 | +100 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ -1 | ♥A | +50 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA +2 | ♥K | +150 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +1 | ♦A | −450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Ergebnis: 4. Rang mit 283,6 MP = 53,71 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (9)
| Runde 1 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | S 5♠ X = | ♥A | +650 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -1 | ♥3 | +50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 20,46 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | S 2SA -5 | ♦5 | −250 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♥A | −620 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ -1 | ♠7 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♣7 | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 2SA +2 | ♥9 | −180 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA = | ♣B | −400 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ = | ♥7 | +420 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA +1 | ♠K | +120 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 36,4 MP | = | 82,64 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | S 3♦ -1 | ♠D | −50 | = | 15,4 MP | + | 69,82 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -2 | ♣2 | +100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 4♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +2 | ♦9 | −680 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +1 | ♠2 | −630 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 18,18 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA = | ♠B | −120 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ -4 | ♠K | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 2SA = | ♥K | +120 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA = | ♠9 | +400 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +1 | ♣A | −450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 34,09 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ +1 | ♥5 | −650 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♠9 | +430 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Ergebnis: 8. Rang mit 261,4 MP = 49,51 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (10)
| Runde 1 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 2♦ +1 | ♣6 | −110 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ +1 | ♦8 | −170 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 36,0 MP | = | 81,82 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA = | ♦7 | +600 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♣4 | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ = | ♦5 | −620 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -2 | ♥5 | +100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 31,82 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ +2 | ♥7 | +200 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ -1 | ♠K | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 27,6 MP | = | 62,82 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | W 3♠ -1 | ♥K | +50 | = | 18,6 MP | ++ | 84,73 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ = | ♣D | −420 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 4♣ = | ♦8 | −130 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 4♥ +2 | ♣8 | −680 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 15,91 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +1 | ♥8 | +140 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +3 | ♦2 | −690 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA +2 | ♠2 | −150 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -4 | ♥3 | +200 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 2SA = | ♥7 | +120 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♥8 | +110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | S 4♣ = | ♠B | +130 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | O 3♠ +3 | ♣3 | −230 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 33,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | S 2♣ +1 | ♠A | +110 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♠2 | +430 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 34,09 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Ergebnis: 6. Rang mit 275,6 MP = 52,20 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (11)
| Runde 1 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 1♠ = | ♥9 | +80 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 2,0 MP | = | 4,55 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | | −650 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | N 5♦ X -3 | | −500 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 1,0 MP | = | 2,28 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ -2 | ♥7 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -2 | ♣8 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 16,7 MP | = | 38,03 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | O 3♣ = | ♦A | −110 | = | 7,7 MP | - | 35,14 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ = | ♦D | −420 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | S 3♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ = | ♣8 | −1430 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 31,82 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 4♠ -2 | ♣10 | −200 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♦7 | −620 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 22,73 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | N 3♥ -2 | ♣10 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♥6 | +430 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 38,64 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3♦ +1 | ♥4 | +130 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | W 5♥ = | ♦A | −450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♣D | −620 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +2 | ♥5 | +460 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 36,0 MP | = | 81,82 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +1 | ♦9 | +140 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 22,73 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 6♥ +1 | ♣7 | −1010 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA = | ♥5 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Ergebnis: 13. Rang mit 192,7 MP = 36,50 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (12)
| Runde 1 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 38,64 % |
| Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +1 | ♦10 | −630 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA = | ♦D | −400 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ = | ♥7 | +140 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ = | ♠K | +110 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 30,9 MP | = | 70,25 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ -2 | ♦B | +100 | = | 21,9 MP | +++ | 99,59 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ = | ♦B | −420 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA -1 | ♦8 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ = | ♠8 | −1430 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 2SA -2 | ♦6 | −200 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 2♥ +3 | ♥8 | −200 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA +1 | ♣B | −150 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ -1 | ♣D | +50 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 6,0 MP | = | 13,64 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 2SA -2 | ♥K | −100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | W 2♥ = | ♣10 | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 18,18 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | N 3♣ -2 | ♠A | −100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | W 5♥ = | ♣A | −450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | S 4♣ X -2 | ♠A | −500 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♥3 | −50 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 20,46 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA = | ♠5 | −90 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 3♦ = | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | W 5♥ +1 | ♠B | −480 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA = | ♥4 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 101: Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (34,58 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | N 2♣ = | ♠7 | +90 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ -2 | ♦D | +200 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Ergebnis: 12. Rang mit 212,9 MP = 40,32 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (13)
| Runde 1 | gegen 113: Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (51,08 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 25 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ = | ♥7 | +420 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 26 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA -1 | ♠K | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 112: Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (57,75 %) | 15,1 MP | = | 34,30 % |
| Board 1 | Nord-Süd | O 2♣ = | ♦A | −90 | = | 12,1 MP | | 54,95 % |
| Board 2 | Nord-Süd | O 4♠ +1 | ♥5 | −450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 111: Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (54,11 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 4♣ -1 | ♦8 | +100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 4 | Nord-Süd | W 6♥ = | ♠8 | −1430 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 110: Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (44,72 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 3♠ = | ♥8 | +140 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 6 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ = | ♦3 | −620 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 109: Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (48,05 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ -1 | ♣K | +50 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 108: Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (42,10 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 9 | Nord-Süd | S 1SA +1 | ♥7 | +120 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 10 | Nord-Süd | O 1SA -2 | ♠D | +200 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 107: Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (59,53 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 22,73 % |
| Board 11 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ = | ♦D | −110 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 5♣ -3 | ♥K | −300 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 106: Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (58,60 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 13 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ -2 | ♣D | +200 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 105: Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (45,06 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 34,09 % |
| Board 15 | Nord-Süd | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 3♦ = | ♠A | −110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 104: Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (46,14 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 17 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ X = | ♥A | +590 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 18 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +1 | ♥4 | −430 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 103: Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (57,58 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -3 | ♣B | +300 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 20 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♣2 | −620 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 102: Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (50,08 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♥10 | +110 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 22 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +2 | ♦B | −680 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Ergebnis: 10. Rang mit 242,1 MP = 45,85 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Ermert – Fr. Petersen (101)
| Runde 1 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 8,6 MP | = | 19,57 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | | | 40-% | = | 7,6 MP | - | 34,59 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ -2 | ♥4 | +100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 22,73 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | W 2SA +3 | ♠B | −210 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 36,0 MP | = | 81,82 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 3SA -1 | ♥6 | −50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | W 2♥ +1 | ♦K | −140 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 20,46 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | O 3♦ -1 | ♣A | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA +2 | ♥5 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +3 | ♠B | −510 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 2SA +1 | ♥4 | −150 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 4♥ -1 | ♠5 | −100 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 3,0 MP | = | 6,82 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | N 3SA = | ♣8 | +600 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 0,0 MP | = | 0,00 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 3♦ +1 | ♠A | +130 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 3♥ +3 | ♣10 | −230 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 36,0 MP | = | 81,82 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA = | ♠B | −120 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | N 4♥ -4 | ♠K | −200 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | S 4♣ = | ♠B | +130 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | O 3♠ +3 | ♣3 | −230 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 18,18 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 2SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +1 | ♦9 | +140 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | N 2♣ = | ♠7 | +90 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ -2 | ♦D | +200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Ergebnis: 13. Rang mit 182,6 MP = 34,58 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Wilden – Fr. Woite (102)
| Runde 1 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 4♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 5♥ +1 | ♠8 | −680 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | W 2SA -1 | ♥K | +50 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 4♦ = | ♠A | +130 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | S 4♥ +2 | ♣A | +680 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 38,0 MP | = | 86,37 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA +1 | ♠5 | −120 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | N 2♣ -1 | ♥K | −50 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 3♠ +1 | ♦D | −170 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 20,46 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 2♥ +2 | ♠D | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ X -1 | ♣A | +100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 22,4 MP | = | 50,82 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | W 3♠ -1 | ♦9 | +50 | = | 3,4 MP | -- | 15,27 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ +1 | ♦D | −450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 3SA +1 | ♠2 | −630 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 2SA = | ♥7 | +120 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♥8 | +110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♣D | −620 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA +2 | ♥5 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | W 5♥ +1 | ♠B | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA = | ♥4 | −400 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 33,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♥10 | +110 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +2 | ♦B | −680 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Ergebnis: 7. Rang mit 264,4 MP = 50,08 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Kames – Fr. Scholtes (103)
| Runde 1 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | S 1SA +3 | ♥4 | +180 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | W 3SA +1 | ♣3 | −630 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 1SA +3 | ♥K | +180 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ -2 | ♥8 | −200 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 36,0 MP | = | 81,82 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 2♠ +2 | ♣D | −170 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 2♦ +2 | ♣8 | +130 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | W 6♥ +1 | ♠B | −1010 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA -1 | ♥4 | +50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +1 | ♥10 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +2 | ♠4 | −680 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 30,0 MP | = | 68,18 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 3♠ +2 | ♣A | +200 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 2♥ -1 | ♠K | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 4♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +2 | ♦9 | −680 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 1SA +2 | ♠2 | −150 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | W 3SA -4 | ♥3 | +200 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 27,0 MP | = | 61,37 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3♦ +1 | ♥4 | +130 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | W 5♥ = | ♦A | −450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 35,0 MP | = | 79,55 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA = | ♠5 | −90 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 3♦ = | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 3SA -3 | ♣B | +300 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♣2 | −620 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 3SA -1 | ♦5 | +100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ X = | ♣A | −590 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Ergebnis: 4. Rang mit 304,0 MP = 57,58 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Freihoff – Fr. Weber (104)
| Runde 1 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2♠ = | ♣B | −110 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | W 3♣ X -1 | ♥2 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 38,64 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3SA -2 | ♠A | −100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | S 4♥ X +1 | ♣A | +990 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 5,0 MP | = | 11,37 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 2SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | N 3♠ +2 | ♦9 | +200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 3♦ = | ♣B | −110 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ -1 | ♦D | +100 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 4♥ = | ♣A | −620 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 7,6 MP | = | 17,37 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | S 3♦ -1 | ♠D | −50 | = | 6,6 MP | - | 30,18 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | W 1SA -2 | ♣2 | +100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 37,0 MP | = | 84,09 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +1 | ♥8 | +140 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | W 3SA +3 | ♦2 | −690 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 3SA +1 | ♥6 | +430 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | S 4♣ X -2 | ♠A | −500 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA -1 | ♥3 | −50 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | S 4♠ X = | ♥A | +590 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA +1 | ♥4 | −430 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 4♥ -1 | ♠5 | −100 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | N 3SA -1 | ♣8 | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Ergebnis: 9. Rang mit 243,6 MP = 46,14 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Lanzi – Hr. Fotescu (105)
| Runde 1 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 1SA +2 | ♥K | +150 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♥8 | +110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 4♠ -1 | ♣D | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA -1 | ♥4 | +50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♣B | +110 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♣4 | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 27,28 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ = | ♥7 | +420 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 1SA +1 | ♠K | +120 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | W 4♣ = | ♦8 | −130 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +2 | ♣8 | −680 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 34,0 MP | = | 77,28 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | N 3♥ -2 | ♣10 | −100 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 36,0 MP | = | 81,82 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3♣ -2 | ♠A | −100 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | W 5♥ = | ♣A | −450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 29,0 MP | = | 65,91 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 3♦ = | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 5,0 MP | = | 11,37 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | N 1SA X = | ♦10 | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ -1 | ♥A | +100 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 5,0 MP | = | 11,37 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 3SA -1 | ♦A | +100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3SA -1 | ♥7 | +50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 17,9 MP | = | 40,71 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | O 2♣ = | ♦A | −90 | = | 9,9 MP | | 45,05 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 2♠ +4 | ♥3 | −230 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Ergebnis: 10. Rang mit 237,9 MP = 45,06 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Pühringer – Fr. Schlicker (106)
| Runde 1 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3SA -3 | ♠6 | −150 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | N 4♠ X = | ♣B | +790 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA -2 | ♦7 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 2♦ +2 | ♣9 | −130 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♦D | −620 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 2SA +2 | ♥9 | −180 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3SA = | ♣B | −400 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 16,4 MP | = | 37,18 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | W 3♠ -1 | ♥K | +50 | = | 3,4 MP | -- | 15,27 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ = | ♣D | −420 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 30,0 MP | = | 68,18 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ -2 | ♣10 | −200 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♦7 | −620 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 38,0 MP | = | 86,37 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 2SA -2 | ♥K | −100 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | W 2♥ = | ♣10 | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 4♠ -2 | ♣D | +200 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA +1 | ♥2 | −430 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +1 | ♣B | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +2 | ♦B | −680 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ X -1 | ♥7 | −100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | N 1SA = | ♠8 | +90 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 4♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 6♥ = | ♠8 | −1430 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 309,4 MP = 58,60 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Hr. Jakobs – Hr. Lanzi (107)
| Runde 1 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | S 4♣ -1 | ♠A | −100 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA +1 | ♠2 | +430 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 4SA = | ♥4 | −430 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | S 4♥ -1 | ♠7 | −100 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♣7 | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 30,0 MP | = | 68,18 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 3♠ +2 | ♥7 | +200 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 2♥ -1 | ♠K | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 32,0 MP | = | 72,73 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 3♦ -2 | ♣A | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 6♥ = | ♣8 | −1430 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 33,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA +1 | ♣B | −150 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | O 2♠ -1 | ♣D | +50 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 34,0 MP | = | 77,28 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | O 2♠ = | ♦D | −110 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | N 5♣ -3 | ♥K | −300 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 6,0 MP | = | 13,64 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♥6 | +110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 37,0 MP | = | 84,09 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 2♦ +2 | ♣B | −130 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ X = | ♦D | −790 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 63,64 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 2♥ +3 | ♠9 | −200 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 27,3 MP | = | 61,98 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | O 2♥ = | ♠B | −110 | = | 14,3 MP | + | 64,86 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ = | ♥5 | −420 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 6,0 MP | = | 13,64 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ = | ♣10 | +620 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 3♥ = | ♣8 | −140 | = | 2,0 MP | --- | 9,09 % |
| Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 314,3 MP = 59,53 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Canthal – Fr. Hack (108)
| Runde 1 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 47,73 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 35,0 MP | = | 79,55 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | S 2SA -5 | ♦5 | −250 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♥A | −620 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 4♥ = | ♦5 | −620 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3SA -2 | ♥5 | +100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 27,3 MP | = | 61,98 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | O 3♣ = | ♦A | −110 | = | 14,3 MP | + | 64,86 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ = | ♦D | −420 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 2SA -2 | ♦6 | −200 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 2♥ +3 | ♥8 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 1SA +1 | ♥7 | +120 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | O 1SA -2 | ♠D | +200 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | S 2♣ = | ♠A | +90 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA +1 | ♣2 | +430 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | S 4♠ +1 | ♣8 | +450 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA -5 | ♥4 | +250 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 1♠ +2 | ♥10 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♣4 | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 2♥ -1 | ♦8 | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | W 4♣ -1 | ♦8 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +2 | ♠8 | −680 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA -3 | ♥3 | +300 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | S 3SA -1 | ♥5 | −50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Ergebnis: 12. Rang mit 222,3 MP = 42,10 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Barthelmess – Fr. Ruhland (109)
| Runde 1 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | S 5♠ X = | ♥A | +650 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA -1 | ♥3 | +50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 18,18 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | S 3SA = | ♦7 | +600 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♣4 | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 43,0 MP | = | 97,73 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ -2 | ♥7 | −100 | = | 21,0 MP | +++ | 95,45 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | N 3SA -2 | ♣8 | −200 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | W 3SA -1 | ♦8 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 6♥ = | ♠8 | −1430 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | O 2♠ -1 | ♣K | +50 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 31,82 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3♣ +1 | ♥4 | +130 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | S 4♥ +1 | ♣A | +650 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | S 3♥ = | ♦A | +140 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 2SA = | ♥3 | −120 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ +1 | ♦D | −650 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | W 2♥ +2 | ♦B | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 23,7 MP | = | 53,93 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | W 2♠ +2 | ♦3 | −170 | = | 19,7 MP | +++ | 89,68 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ -1 | ♦D | +50 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♣8 | −650 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 3SA -1 | ♣4 | −50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♥8 | +110 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Ergebnis: 8. Rang mit 253,7 MP = 48,05 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Kauschke – Fr. Sennewald (110)
| Runde 1 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 2♦ +1 | ♣6 | −110 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 3♠ +1 | ♦8 | −170 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 42,0 MP | = | 95,46 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | | −650 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | N 5♦ X -3 | | −500 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 13,1 MP | = | 29,75 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | O 4♥ -2 | ♦B | +100 | = | 0,1 MP | --- | 0,41 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ = | ♦B | −420 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 3♠ = | ♥8 | +140 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 4♥ = | ♦3 | −620 | = | 9,0 MP | | 40,91 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 2,0 MP | = | 4,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 3SA +1 | ♥10 | +430 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | O 4♥ X -1 | ♠A | +200 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 3♠ -1 | ♣D | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 26,0 MP | = | 59,09 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | O 5♥ +2 | ♠A | −510 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA = | ♠3 | −400 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 29,55 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +1 | ♥10 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ = | ♥7 | +420 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 2♥ -1 | ♣A | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 4♦ -1 | ♣A | −50 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +2 | ♣8 | −680 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 3SA -1 | ♠B | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | O 2♠ -1 | ♦D | +50 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +1 | ♦A | −450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Ergebnis: 11. Rang mit 236,1 MP = 44,72 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Mähliss – Hr. Mähliss (111)
| Runde 1 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 1♠ = | ♥9 | +80 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♦B | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 3♠ = | ♥7 | +140 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 2♥ = | ♠K | +110 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | W 4♣ -1 | ♦8 | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 6♥ = | ♠8 | −1430 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA = | ♠2 | −120 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | O 2♠ -2 | ♥A | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3♦ +1 | ♠A | +130 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | N 4♠ -1 | ♣B | −100 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 29,0 MP | = | 65,91 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 3♦ = | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 33,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | O 2SA +1 | ♣6 | −150 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♦D | −620 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | W 3♥ +1 | ♦6 | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 25,7 MP | = | 58,48 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | W 3♠ +1 | ♥K | −170 | = | 19,7 MP | +++ | 89,68 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 3♠ +1 | ♣D | −170 | = | 6,0 MP | - | 27,27 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 52,28 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 3SA +2 | ♥8 | −660 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 43,18 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 1SA +2 | ♥K | +150 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 29,0 MP | = | 65,91 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 4♠ +1 | ♥5 | −650 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA +1 | ♠9 | +430 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Ergebnis: 5. Rang mit 285,7 MP = 54,11 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Heckmann – Fr. von Katte (112)
| Runde 1 | gegen 12: Fr. Lobeck – Hr. Jahnel (40,32 %) | 27,0 MP | = | 61,37 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | O 3SA +1 | ♦10 | −630 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3SA = | ♦D | −400 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 28,9 MP | = | 65,71 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | O 2♣ = | ♦A | −90 | = | 9,9 MP | | 45,05 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | O 4♠ +1 | ♥5 | −450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 31,0 MP | = | 70,46 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 1SA +2 | ♦6 | +150 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 3SA +2 | ♠5 | −660 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 40,0 MP | = | 90,91 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 3SA -1 | ♥K | −50 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | S 2SA -4 | ♠B | −400 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | W 4♠ -2 | ♣D | +200 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA = | ♣8 | +400 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 30,0 MP | = | 68,18 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | O 6♥ +1 | ♠A | −1010 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | N 3♥ -3 | ♠10 | −300 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2SA = | ♣2 | +120 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 22 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♠2 | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 22,73 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ +1 | ♥7 | +450 | = | 3,0 MP | -- | 13,64 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 2♦ = | ♠K | +90 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 39,0 MP | = | 88,64 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | S 3♠ -3 | ♥9 | −150 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 6♥ = | ♣6 | −1430 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 36,37 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA -1 | ♥3 | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | O 2♠ -1 | ♥A | +50 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 45,46 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3SA = | ♠9 | +400 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 4,55 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | W 4♥ +1 | ♣A | −450 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 29,0 MP | = | 65,91 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA -1 | ♠5 | +50 | = | 13,0 MP | | 59,09 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | W 2♦ +1 | ♠A | −110 | = | 16,0 MP | + | 72,73 % |
| Ergebnis: 3. Rang mit 304,9 MP = 57,75 % — Top: 22 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Teschner – Hr. Dr. Korthues (113)
| Runde 1 | gegen 13: Fr. Dr. Mai – Fr. Schmidt (45,85 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 56,82 % |
| Board 25 | Ost-West | S 4♠ = | ♥7 | +420 | = | 10,0 MP | | 45,45 % |
| Board 26 | Ost-West | S 1SA -1 | ♠K | −100 | = | 15,0 MP | + | 68,18 % |
| Runde 2 | gegen 1: Fr. Schürmann – Hr. Granderath (60,08 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 3 | Ost-West | W 4♥ -1 | ♠K | +100 | = | 5,0 MP | -- | 22,73 % |
| Board 4 | Ost-West | W 6♥ = | ♣8 | −1430 | = | 17,0 MP | ++ | 77,27 % |
| Runde 3 | gegen 2: Fr. Jeltsch – Fr. Rudolph (58,14 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2SA -1 | ♠2 | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 8 | Ost-West | O 3♠ X -3 | ♥A | +500 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 4 | gegen 3: Fr. Hoffmann – Fr. Lauber (43,96 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 11 | Ost-West | N 3♦ -1 | ♥4 | −50 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Board 12 | Ost-West | S 3♥ +4 | ♥5 | +260 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 5 | gegen 4: xxx – xxx (50,70 %) | 27,0 MP | = | 61,37 % |
| Board 15 | Ost-West | W 1SA = | ♠5 | −90 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Board 16 | Ost-West | S 3♥ -1 | ♦A | −50 | = | 8,0 MP | - | 36,36 % |
| Runde 6 | gegen 5: Fr. Oeffner – Hr. Oeffner (49,49 %) | 37,0 MP | = | 84,09 % |
| Board 19 | Ost-West | W 2♥ +1 | ♦9 | −140 | = | 18,0 MP | ++ | 81,82 % |
| Board 20 | Ost-West | W 4♠ +1 | ♦D | −650 | = | 19,0 MP | ++ | 86,36 % |
| Runde 7 | gegen 6: Fr. von Hasselbach – xxx (57,44 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 40,91 % |
| Board 23 | Ost-West | S 1♦ -1 | ♠A | −100 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 24 | Ost-West | W 4♥ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Runde 8 | gegen 7: Fr. Mennicken – Hr. De Bruecker (52,52 %) | 41,7 MP | = | 94,84 % |
| Board 1 | Ost-West | W 3♠ +1 | ♦2 | −170 | = | 19,7 MP | +++ | 89,68 % |
| Board 2 | Ost-West | W 3SA +2 | ♣5 | −460 | = | 22,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
| Runde 9 | gegen 8: Fr. Paris – Fr. von Pless (53,71 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 9,09 % |
| Board 5 | Ost-West | N 4♠ = | ♥8 | +620 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 6 | Ost-West | O 5♥ -1 | ♣8 | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
| Runde 10 | gegen 9: Fr. H. Beier – Fr. Groove (49,51 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 54,55 % |
| Board 9 | Ost-West | S 2SA = | ♥K | +120 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2♠ -1 | ♥8 | −100 | = | 12,0 MP | | 54,55 % |
| Runde 11 | gegen 10: Fr. Lühring – Hr. Dr. Foertsch (52,20 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 13 | Ost-West | S 2♣ +1 | ♠A | +110 | = | 4,0 MP | -- | 18,18 % |
| Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3SA +1 | ♠2 | +430 | = | 7,0 MP | - | 31,82 % |
| Runde 12 | gegen 11: Fr. Krämer – Hr. Deygas (36,50 %) | 34,0 MP | = | 77,28 % |
| Board 17 | Ost-West | O 6♥ +1 | ♣7 | −1010 | = | 20,0 MP | +++ | 90,91 % |
| Board 18 | Ost-West | W 3SA = | ♥5 | −400 | = | 14,0 MP | + | 63,64 % |
| Ergebnis: 6. Rang mit 269,7 MP = 51,08 % — Top: 22 MP |